Activities of the Responsible Institutions of Latvia and the Russian Federation in the Fulfilment of the Obligations Arising from the Agreement of their Governments on the status of Latvian and Russian Gravesites on their territories

Report ID: 104

In April  2011  the State Audit Office and the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation decided to carry out a compliance parallel audit regarding the activities of the responsible institutions of the Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation the fulfilment of the obligations arising from the Agreement of the government of the Republic of Latvia and the government of the Russian Federation on the status of Latvian gravesites on the territory of the Russian Federation and the status of Russian gravesites on the territory of the Republic of Latvia.

The objective of the audit was to determine whether the responsible authorities of  Latvia and the Russian Federation have ensured the fulfilment of the obligations arising from the Agreement of 18 December 2007 between their goverments on the status of Latvian gravesites on the territory of the Russian Federation and the status of Russian gravesites on the territory of Latvia.

Source: https://bit.ly/2TC9B28

The Pacific Regional Report of the Cooperative Audit of Preparedness for Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals

Report ID: 338

In 2016, 73 SAIs and one sub-national audit office from six INTOSAI regions compromised to participate in an ISSAI-based cooperative performance audit of preparedness for implementation of the (SDGs). The purpose of the cooperative performance audit was to highlight the ongoing relevance of SAIs, by their contribution through high-quality performance audits of country preparedness to implement the SDGs.

In PASAI, 13 SAIs participated in the cooperative audit – Cook Islands, Fiji, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) National, FSM Pohnpei, FSM Kosrae, FSM Yap,Kiribati, Palau, PNG, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Tuvalu. This audit was led by the FSM National Public Auditor’s office in combination with the state SAIs of Kosrae, Pohnpei, and Yap. Because the Public Auditor’s office in the State of Chuuk was in transition, the national office also assessed preparedness in the State of Chuuk. As a result, there was one consolidated audit report that reported on the administrative preparedness to implement the SDGs at the national level plus at the state and local levels.

The cooperative audit was based on a Whole of Government approach. This implies that any audit of the implementation of an individual SDG goal or target will also need to look at its interconnections with other goals and targets.

The SAIs followed the Guidance on Auditing Preparedness developed by UN, the INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Committee and IDI and during the audit covered the following key audit objectives:

• To what extent has the government adapted the 2030 Agenda into its national context?
• Has the government identified and secured resources and capacities (means of implementation) needed to implement the 2030 Agenda?
• Has the Government established a mechanism to monitor, follow-up, review and report on the progress towards the implementation of the SDGs?

This audit was supported by PASAI by joining with IDI to facilitate the planning and reporting meetings and provided dedicated on-site support to audit teams where required. The report contains lessons learnt from the audit.

Source: https://www.pasai.org/cooperative-performance-audit-reports

Parallel Audit on the processes for identifying, reporting and following up on Irregularities

Report ID: 414

In this report the Working Group submitted to the Contact Committee its key findings, good practices, weaknesses and recommendations on the processes in place for identifying, reporting and following up on irregularities depending on Country Reports prepared as results of the parallel audits conducted by the participating SAIs. The findings of the report are related to six key areas: 1) Guidance; 2) Identification and recording of potential irregularities; 3) Examination and decision-making on recorded irregularities; 4) Reporting to the Commission; 5) Follow up/investigation of the reported irregularities; 6) Financial Corrections.

Source: https://www.eca.europa.eu/sites/cc/Lists/CCDocuments/1959834/1959834_EN.PDF