Bericht über die parallele Prüfung der Leistung der Strukturfondsprogramme der EU in den Bereichen Beschäftigung und Umwelt
Report ID: 343

2006 erteilte der Kontaktausschuss der Arbeitsgruppe "Strukturfonds" das Mandat, ihre Überprüfungen von Strukturfondsfragen fortzusetzen und insbesondere eine gezielte Überprüfung der "Leistung (Output/Effektivität) der Strukturfondsprogramme in den Bereichen Beschäftigung und/oder Umwelt″ durchzuführen. Die Arbeitsgruppe einigte sich auf einen Prüfungsplan, der einen Rahmen für die Durchführung der Überprüfung bot. Jede ORKB untersuchte die Arbeit ihrer jeweiligen nationalen Verwaltung bei der Planung, Begleitung und Bewertung von Projekten, Maßnahmen, Unterprogrammen oder Programmen (je nach Fall), die von den Strukturfonds kofinanziert werden.

Die ORKBn von Österreich, Finnland, Deutschland, Ungarn, Italien, Lettland, Malta, den Niederlanden, Polen, Portugal, der Slowakischen Republik, Slowenien, Spanien und dem Vereinigten Königreich nahmen an der Prüfung teil. Die ORKB von Bulgarien, der Tschechischen Republik und Litauen sowie der Europäische Rechnungshof waren Beobachter. Ziel war es, Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten bei den Strukturfondsprogrammen zu identifizieren, insbesondere bei der Planung und der administrativen Abwicklung.

Die Überprüfung bezog jede ORKB in eine Untersuchung der Strukturfonds (Ziele 1 und 2) in den Bereichen Beschäftigung und/oder Umwelt ein und kam zu folgenden Ergebnissen

- ob und wie die nationalen Behörden den nachhaltigen Erfolg der geförderten Maßnahmen kontrollierten;

- inwieweit die Fördermaßnahmen (Teilprogramme, Großprojekte und sonstige Projekte) einen wirksamen und nachhaltigen Beitrag zu den strategischen Zielen der Strukturfonds leisteten.

Der Prüfungsgegenstand war ein wichtiges Thema, das sowohl für die Strukturfondsprogramme 2000-2006 als auch 2007- 2013 von Bedeutung war. Die Prüfung bezog sich auf die beiden Schlüsselbereiche der strategischen Planung und der Bewertung von Fördermaßnahmen. Auf der Grundlage der Prüfung von Maßnahmen aus dem Zeitraum 2000-2006 wollte jede der ORKBn zu dem Schluss kommen, inwieweit die Mitgliedstaaten zur Verwirklichung der strategischen Ziele des jeweiligen OPs beigetragen haben. Da die Ziele der Strukturfonds von der Periode 2000-2006 in die Programmperiode 2007-2013 übergegangen sind, wurden die Erkenntnisse aus der Prüfung der Maßnahmen aus der Periode 2000- 2006 genutzt, um die Empfehlungen für die Verbesserung der neuen Periode 2007-2013 zu untermauern.

Der Bericht enthält die von den einzelnen ORKB ermittelten bewährten Praktiken, die für beide Programmzeiträume 2000-2006 und 2007-2013 relevant sind. Als allgemeine gute Praxis wurden viele der aus dem Programmzeitraum 2000-2006 gezogenen Lehren in die Verwaltungsvereinbarungen der Mitgliedstaaten für 2007-2013 aufgenommen.

Quelle: https://www.eca.europa.eu/sites/cc/Lists/CCDocuments/1959901/1959901_DE.PDF

Joint Report on the Results of Parallel Audits of Excise Duty Administration in the Slovak Republic and in the Czech Republic
Report ID: 344

Legislation in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia on excise duty and its administration complies with EU legislation and exceeds EU requirements substantially. Differences have been discovered between Slovak and Czech excise duty regulations: in the Czech Republic, verification of the economic stability of applicants for permits and mandatory labelling and dyeing of several mineral and some other oils contribute to effective excise duty administration; in Slovakia, the distribution of excise stamps is simpler than in the Czech Republic and less of a burden on excise duty administrators. In the fight against excise duty evasion, supervising the movement of raw tobacco or tobacco materials, the implementation of the institute of a transport fuel distributor, and keeping a registry of merchants of consumer packaged alcohol appear to be a good practice in the fight against excise duty evasion. Excise duty revenues in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia grow more slowly than other tax revenues

In August 2015, The Supreme Audit Institutions of  Czech Republic and Slovakia agreed to conduct parallel audits aimed primarily at excise duty administration an signed an Agreement for this purpose. The topic of the parallel audits was chosen because both EU Member States follow common European legislation on this matter, thereby providing an opportunity to ascertain how European legislation is applied on a national level, how the excise duty administration system is set up, and how the system in Slovakia and the system in the Czech Republic differ.

The audit questions on which the parallel audits were based were agreed jointly. The parallel audits aimed to compare the performance of the excise duty administrators while taking into account qualitative and quantitative indicators and identifying weaknesses in the excise duty administration process. Answers to the following audit questions in particular should have been sought:

- Have excise duty administrators in the Czech Republic and Slovakia been attaining comparable values of qualitative indicators while incurring comparable costs?

- Has implementation of the EMCS1 resulted in more effective excise duty administration and has been spending on its implementation effective?

- The joint final report on the audit results was drawn up in accordance with ISSAI 300 - Fundamental Principles of Performance Auditing

Source: https://www.nku.cz/assets/publikace-a-dokumenty/ostatni-publikace/spolecna-zprava-kontrola-spotrebni-dane-cr-sr_en_1.pdf

Administration of Value Added Tax in the Czech Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany Follow-up Audit Report
Report ID: 345

VAT is an audit area which is very suitable for tax audit cooperation because it is the only tax harmonised within the EU. The Supreme Audit Office of the Czech Republic (hereinafter “Czech SAI”) and the Federal Court of Auditors – Bundesrechnungshof (hereinafter “German SAI”) conducted a first ever parallel audit in the field of VAT in 2006. The report was published in 2008 (The report si also published in the catalogue at https://intosai-cooperativeaudits.org/catalog/report/report-on-the-results-of-the-parallel-audit-of-the-administration-of-value-added-tax-in-the-czech-republic-and-in-the-federal-republic-of-germany).

The follow-up audit of the administration of VAT in the Czech Republic and in Germany was carried out on the basis of an agreement between the two SAIs. During previous parallel audits, suspicious cases of intra-Community transactions were detected. Some of them merited further review. On the basis of audit findings the two SAIs produced recommendations on VAT management.

The follow-up audit was conducted to evaluate the action taken in response to these recommendations and to review the suspicious cases selected. In addition, the two SAIs decided to examine the following matters in their parallel audit mission:

• review of selected cases of intra-Community transactions between taxpayers from the Czech Republic and Germany that were not resolved during the previous parallel audit,

• review of selected cases of intra-Community transactions between taxpayers from the Czech Republic and Germany that were classified as high-risk cases,

• audit of the tax administrations’ procedure in the field of international assistance for the recovery of VAT claims,

• VAT audits of large companies.

The cooperation of the two SAIs within the parallel audits of the administration of VAT achieved the objectives set by the German and Czech SAI. The two SAIs developed a deeper understanding of the applicable systems in the Czech Republic and Germany in the fields of:

• intra-Community transactions

• risk management of VAT, especially concerning the selection of risk prone transactions

, • recovery of VAT claims, and

• VAT audits of large tax entities.

Due to mutual cooperation, differences of strategies to detect VAT fraud cases and in the above mentioned areas of VAT administration in the Czech Republic and Germany were revealed. Audit findings were compared and on their basis best practices were identified. Furthermore, the SAIs hope that the results achieved may encourage stakeholders to enter into discussions about approaches and strategies within and among Member States as well as with the EU Commission.

Source: https://www.nku.cz/assets/publications-documents/other-publications/paralelni-kontroly-spravy-dph-cr-srn-2010.pdf

Bericht über die von NKÚ und BRH durchgeführte koordinierte Prüfung der MwSt. im Rahmen der Mini-One-Stop-Shop-Regelung
Report ID: 346

Die Obersten Rechnungskontrollbehörden (ORKB) der Tschechischen Republik und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland arbeiten bereits seit vielen Jahren erfolgreich auf dem Gebiet der Umsatzsteuer zusammen und haben auch zwei koordinierte Prüfungen durchgeführt. Die beiden ORKBn beschlossen, sich erstmals mit dem Thema E-Commerce und Umsatzsteuer zu befassen, wobei sie aktuelle wirtschaftliche Entwicklungen aufgriffen und eine gemeinsame Prüfung durchführten. Prüfungsgegenstand war die Besteuerung von digitalen Dienstleistungen, die von EU-Unternehmen an private Verbraucher in der Europäischen Union erbracht werden. Die Prüfung umfasste den Zeitraum vom 1. Januar 2015 bis zum 30. Juni 2017.

Ziel der Prüfung war es, zu untersuchen:

- wie die Steuerbehörden der beiden Länder ihrer EU-Verpflichtung zur Umsetzung des MOSS nachgekommen sind;

  - aufkommende Schwierigkeiten bei der Umsetzung; und

 - inwieweit das MOSS-System geeignet ist, die Erhebung der Umsatzsteuer sicherzustellen. Beide ORKBn fassten ihre Erkenntnisse in nationalen Berichten zusammen und verfassten auf dieser Grundlage den gemeinsamen Bericht.

Bericht auf Englisch: https://intosai-cooperativeaudits.org/catalog/report/report-on-the-coordinated-audit-carried-out-by-nk-and-brh-on-vat-under-the-mini-one-stop-shop-scheme

Quelle: https://www.nku.cz/assets/publications-documents/other-publications/joint-report-vat-under-moss-scheme-2019-de.pdf

 

RESULTS OF THE PARALLEL AUDIT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEMORANDUM BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA ON IMPORTANT PROJECTS FOR EXPANSION OF THE BILATERAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION
Report ID: 347

In Moscow, on 17 November 2010, the Republic of Slovenia and the Russian Federation signed a Declaration on Partnership for Modernisation. The Partnership Declaration is based on the Joint Statement of the European Union and the Russian Federation adopted at the European Union - Russian Federation Summit held on 31 May and 1 June 2010 in Rostow-on-Don.

At the signing of the Partnership Declaration, the Governments of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Slovenia also signed the Memorandum on important projects, in which they expressed their readiness to facilitate the stimulating and encouraging of mutual investments into the innovative technologies, creation and market promotion of modern competitive goods as well as confirmed their aspiration for the expansion of high value-added goods and high-technology products share in trade volume.

Upon the approval of the Programme of important projects, the Governments of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Slovenia placing the priority on the Programme implementation, agreed to conduct the further monitoring of its implementation on regular basis according to the effective legislation, which should contribute to the promotion of bilateral cooperation on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and reciprocity as well as to the realisation of individual projects within the framework of cooperation in the interest of modernisation

The grounds for the implementation of the parallel audit iwas the Agreement on parallel audit by the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation and the Court of Audit of the Republic of Slovenia signed by the two Supreme Audit Institutions  (SAIs) on 29 April 2013 in Moscow. The Agreement defines in detail the cooperation of the Supreme Audit Institutions in the implementation of the audit.

The purpose of the audit was to assess the status of economic cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Slovenia taking into consideration the fulfilling of the Programme for the implementation of the Memorandum on important projects for expansion of the bilateral economic cooperation.

Among others, the effectiveness of the achievement of the objectives of economic cooperation was assessed by both SAIs.

Source: http://www.rs-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/news/2053/Joint_Report_ENG_final.pdf