Auditoría Coordinada Gobernanza de Fronteras – Sumario Ejecutivo con enfoque ambiental

Report ID: 286

En el marco de las actividades del Comité de Creación de Capacidades (CCC) de la Organización Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Entidades Fiscalizadoras Superiores (OLACEFS), las EFS de Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil (EFS Coordinadora), Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, México, Paraguay, Perú y República Dominicana realizaron una auditoría coordinada a  para evaluar el nivel de implementación de buenas prácticas de gobernanza en las políticas de seguridad pública y desarrollo en las regiones fronterizas de sus respectivo países, con el fin de mejorar la implementación y gestión de acciones gubernamentales en estas regiones.

Esta auditoría contó con el apoyo técnico de la Cooperación Alemana a través de GIZ – Deutsche Gesellschaf für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH – como parte del proyecto Fortalecimiento del Control Externo en el Área Ambiental, que se está implementando en asociación con la EFS de Brasil y la OLACEFS.

Para este trabajo, las EFS participantes aplicaron el Índice de Gobernanza de Políticas Nacionales de Fronteras (iGPNFron) y el informe conjunto se centra en la calidad de los factores estructurales vinculados a la gobernanza de las políticas nacionales de fronteras y no en el desempeño de la gestión de estas políticas.

FUENTE: https://www.olacefs.com/auditorias-coordinadas/

INTOSAI WGEA Coordinated audit of climate change

Report ID: 290

In June 2007, the INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Audit embarked on a coordinated audit of climate change programs. The project involved 14 SAIs: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Indonesia, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

For this project, from 2007 to 2010, the SAIs cooperated in the design  and undertaking of national audits of their respective governments’ climate change programs and performance. Each SAI undertook one or more audits (in some cases, studies and reviews) in the fields of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and/or climate change adaptation to determine whether their governments were doing what they said they would do. As a result, a joint summary report—Coordinated International Audit on Climate Change: Key Implications for Governments and their Auditors was issued.

In addition, considering that the cooperative audit was the first of its kind for the WGEA and for several of the participating SAIs, as well as their diverse experience in auditing climate change programs, the mix of audit mandates, practices and ideas on how to audit such programs, a  Process Chronicle and Lessons Learned report was prepared by the SAI of Canada (Project Leader).

The purpose of the report is to capture the process used and the lessons learned in executing the coordinated international audit on climate change.

It is divided into three sections:

• a chronicle of the process used to plan and guide the project

• lessons learned from the perspectives of the individual participant

• perspectives of the Project Leader

Source: https://www.environmental-auditing.org/media/2509/15220-e_wgea-coordinated-international-audit-on-climate-change-lessons-learned.pdf

Perspectives on climate change in Canada – A collaborative report from Auditors General

Report ID: 291

To assess climate change action in Canada, provincial auditors general partnered with the federal Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development and the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, which carried out audit work for the three territories in its role as independent auditor for Canada’s northern legislatures.

The overall objective of this collaborative project was to assess whether the federal, provincial, and territorial governments had met their commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to climate change. Although each audit office performed its work independently, the offices worked together to develop a set of common questions related to climate change action to be included in the auditors’ individual reports. he coordination of this work was done through the Office of the Auditor General of Canada by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. This is the first time that so many legislative audit offices in Canada coordinated their work in this way.

The report summarizes audit findings from the reports presented by the provincial audit offices and the Office of the Auditor General of Canada to the provincial, territorial, and federal legislatures. The reports of the participating audit offices were completed between November 2016 and March 2018.

In the planning of the audits, among others, the following model of cooperative audits were considered:

• The International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) Working Group on Environmental Auditing (WGEA) Coordinated Audit on Climate Change 2010.
• The INTOSAI WGEA document Cooperation Between Supreme Audit Institutions: Tips and Examples for Cooperative Audits, 2007

Source:https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_otp_201803_e_42883.html

Collaborative Climate Change Audit Project: Process Chronicle and Lessons Learned

Report ID: 294

In order to assess the progress their governments have made on climate change action, from 2015 to 2018, the Auditors General of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan,   partnered with the federal Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development and the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (Canada, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Yukon), which carried out audit work for the three territories in its role as independent auditor for Canada’s northern legislatures.

This was the first time that so many legislative audit offices in Canada coordinated their work in this way. A project working group was formed in November 2015, consisting of auditors from participating audit offices. Their work culminated in the summary report tabled in Parliament in March 2018 called Perspectives on Climate Change Action in Canada: A Collaborative Report from Auditors General (Available at  https://intosai-cooperativeaudits.org/report/perspectives-con-climate-change-action-in-canada-a-collaborative-report-from-the-auditors-general).

The project team wrote a final report to document the process they used in the collaborative audit in order to assist those planning this kind of work in the future in Canada and elsewhere to assess issues of mutual interest and importance. The Lessons Learned report is divided in three parts.

• The first part chronicles the process developed and used to plan, conduct, report, and communicate during the project.
• The second part summarizes our efforts to identify lessons learned.
• The third part reflects on the above and provides some key perspectives from the Project Manager that could assist others doing similar work in the future.

In the planning of the audits, the report refers that, among others, the following model of cooperative audits were considered:

• The International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) Working Group on Environmental Auditing (WGEA) Coordinated Audit on Climate Change 2010.
• The INTOSAI WGEA document Cooperation Between Supreme Audit Institutions: Tips and Examples for Cooperative Audits, 2007.

Source: https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/oth_201905_e_43380.html

Projet collaboratif d'audit sur le changement climatique : Chronique du processus et leçons apprises

Report ID: 295

Afin d'évaluer les progrès réalisés par leurs gouvernements en matière de lutte contre le changement climatique, de 2015 à 2018, les vérificateurs généraux de l'Alberta, de la Colombie-Britannique, du Manitoba, du Nouveau-Brunswick, de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, de la Nouvelle-Écosse, de l'Ontario, de l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard et de la Saskatchewan, s'est associé au commissaire fédéral à l'environnement et au développement durable et au Bureau du vérificateur général du Canada (Canada,

Territoires du Nord-Ouest, Nunavut, Yukon), qui a effectué des travaux de vérification pour les trois territoires en sa qualité de vérificateur indépendant pour les assemblées législatives du Nord du Canada. C'était la première fois qu'un si grand nombre de bureaux de vérification législative au Canada coordonnaient leur travail de cette manière. Un groupe de travail a été formé en novembre 2015, composé de vérificateurs des bureaux de vérification participants. Leur travail a abouti au rapport de synthèse déposé au Parlement en mars 2018, intitulé Perspectives sur les mesures de lutte contre le changement climatique au Canada : Un rapport de collaboration des vérificateurs généraux (disponible à l'adresse https://intosai-cooperativeaudits.org/report/perspectives-sur-le-changement-climatique-au-canada-un-rapport-conjoint-des-vrificateurs-gnraux

L'équipe de projet a rédigé un rapport final pour documenter le processus utilisé dans l'audit collaboratif afin d'aider ceux qui planifient ce type de travail à l'avenir au Canada et ailleurs à évaluer les questions d'intérêt et d'importance mutuels. Le rapport sur les enseignements tirés est divisé en trois parties.

- La première partie décrit le processus développé et utilisé pour planifier, mener, rendre compte et communiquer au cours du projet.

- La deuxième partie résume nos efforts pour identifier les leçons apprises.

- La troisième partie réfléchit sur ce qui précède et fournit quelques perspectives clés du gestionnaire de projet qui pourraient aider d'autres personnes effectuant un travail similaire à l'avenir. Lors de la planification des audits,

Le rapport mentionne que, entre autres, le modèle suivant d'audits coopératifs a été envisagé : - Le groupe de travail de l'Organisation internationale des institutions supérieures de contrôle des finances publiques (INTOSAI) sur l'audit d'environnement (WGEA) a coordonné l'audit sur le changement climatique 2010. - Le document du GTVE de l'INTOSAI intitulé Coopération entre les institutions supérieures de contrôle : Tips and Examples for Cooperative Audits, 2007.

Source : https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/Francais/oth_201905_f_43380.html

Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator