AUDITORIA COORDENADA SOBRE HABITAÇÃO SOCIAL

Report ID: 301

 O tema da habitação social é central para a realidade da América Latina e das Caraíbas, dada a elevada percentagem da população que vive actualmente em condições precárias. Dada a inquestionável importância social e económica da habitação social na região, no âmbito do Grupo de Trabalho de Auditoria de Obras Públicas (GTOP) do OLACEFS, foi realizada uma auditoria coordenada sobre este tema. As ISC da Argentina, Brasil (Coordenador de Auditoria), Chile, Colômbia, Costa Rica, Honduras, México, Paraguai e República Dominicana participaram na auditoria, a qual teve o apoio da GIZ.

O objectivo da auditoria foi verificar se as políticas de habitação social e os projectos de construção em cada país participante estavam em conformidade com todos os aspectos e recomendações que a Comissão Económica para a Europa das Nações Unidas (UNECE/ONU) apresentou no documento intitulado Guidelines on Social Housing - Principles and Examples (2006), considerado essencial para determinar se a habitação é adequada e também se os objectivos quantitativos estabelecidos para a construção de unidades habitacionais foram definidos e estão a ser cumpridos. Para o efeito, foram revistas as leis e outros regulamentos aplicáveis aos programas de habitação auditados e foi inspeccionada fisicamente uma amostra de 64 unidades/projectos de habitação concluídos, distribuídos por cada país participante, que no seu conjunto totalizam 36.633 habitações.

Source: https://www.olacefs.com/26-10-2016informe-internacional-de-la-auditoria-coordinada-sobre-vivienda-social-portugues/ 

Traduzido com  www.DeepL.com/Translator

Joint Report of the International Coordinated audit of Chernobyl Shelter Fund

Report ID: 219

On April 26, 1986, the worst accident in the history of civilian nuclear power occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, where an explosion destroyed the core of reactor Unit 4 containing approximately 200 tons of nuclear fuel. The explosion and heat from the reactor core propelled radioactive material as much as six miles high, where it was then dispersed mainly over 60,000 square miles of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia. Smaller amounts of radioactive material spread over Eastern and Western Europe and Scandinavia and were even detected in the United States.

The Chernobyl Shelter Fund (CSF) was founded at European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 1997 aimed at financing Shelter Implementation Plant (SIP).The Fund is guided by the set of rules regarding its resource management. Contributor Governments, mainly of G-7 and European Union, contribute to the Fund. The Assembly of Contributors supervises SIP implementation progress.

The Initial SIP costs were estimated at about USD 758 million (about EUR 585 million 4) in 1997. In 2003 and 2004 technical uncertainties and delays in the SIP fulfilment became apparent, especially with the construction of NSC, which resulted in cost escalation to EUR 840 million. The causes of those cost increases and the resulting need for additional steps to control cost and time overruns were discussed at all level including the Assemblies of Contributors. All G-85 Governments agreed to increase the scale of CSF.

Such increase was tied to the requirements to be fulfilled by Ukraine, including improvement of management, removal of procedural obstacles and timely delivery of Ukraine’s contributions. Thus, as of January 2006 estimated total costs were EUR 955 million and term for SIP completion was extended from 2005 to 2010.

Due to failure in timely realization of SIP, in 2006, the Special Subgroup on the Audit of Natural, Man-caused Disasters Consequences and Radioactive Wastes Elimination of the EUROSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing decided to conduct an international coordinated audit of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund.

The aim of the audit was the establishment of actual state of affairs regarding legal, organizational and financial support of decommissioning the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP) and transforming destroyed CNPP Unit 4 into an environmentally safe system by fulfilling the Shelter Implementation Plan.

Source: http://old.ac-rada.gov.ua/img/files/auditeurosai1.pdf

Activities of the Responsible Institutions of Latvia and the Russian Federation in the Fulfilment of the Obligations Arising from the Agreement of their Governments on the status of Latvian and Russian Gravesites on their territories

Report ID: 104

In April  2011  the State Audit Office and the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation decided to carry out a compliance parallel audit regarding the activities of the responsible institutions of the Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation the fulfilment of the obligations arising from the Agreement of the government of the Republic of Latvia and the government of the Russian Federation on the status of Latvian gravesites on the territory of the Russian Federation and the status of Russian gravesites on the territory of the Republic of Latvia.

The objective of the audit was to determine whether the responsible authorities of  Latvia and the Russian Federation have ensured the fulfilment of the obligations arising from the Agreement of 18 December 2007 between their goverments on the status of Latvian gravesites on the territory of the Russian Federation and the status of Russian gravesites on the territory of Latvia.

Source: https://bit.ly/2TC9B28

COORDINATED AUDIT ON SOCIAL HOUSING

Report ID: 300

Given the unquestionable social and economic importance of social housing in the region, under the framework of the OLACEFS Public Works Audit Working Group (GTOP) a coordinated audit was conducted on this topic. The SAIs of Argentina, Brazil (Audit Coordinator), Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay and the Dominican Republic participated in the audit, which had the support of GIZ.

The purpose of the audit was to verify whether social housing policies and construction projects in each participating country were in line with all the aspects and recommendations that the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE/UN) put forward in the document entitled Guidelines on Social Housing – Principles and Examples (2006), which is considered essential for determining if housing is adequate and also whether the quantitative goals set for building housing units were defined and are being met.

Source: https://www.olacefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Resumen-Ejecutivo-ENGLISH-final-AC-viviendas.pdf

Auditoría Coordinada de Energías Renovables

Report ID: 245

La Organización Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Entidades Fiscalizadoras Superiores (OLACEFS), por medio del Grupo de Trabajo de Auditoría de Obras Públicas (GTOP), escogió el tema energías renovables en el sector eléctrico para la realización de una auditoría coordinada.

Participaron en los trabajos conjuntos las Entidades Fiscalizadoras Superiores de doce países (Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, México, Paraguay y Venezuela). Ello hizo posible promover un intercambio de informaciones sobre las políticas energéticas adoptadas en cada país y una posterior consolidación de los resultados de la auditoría, con el propósito de contribuir con la mejora de las estrategias dirigidas hacia la expansión de fuentes limpias en la matriz eléctrica.

El objetivo de la auditoría fue realizar un diagnóstico sobre políticas públicas e inversiones relacionadas con la expansión de las energías renovables en el sector eléctrico en los países participantes de la región de América Latina y el Caribe, en especial identificando buenas prácticas y oportunidades de mejora en dichas políticas, de manera que se contribuya al alcance de los compromisos asumidos por medio de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y del Acuerdo de París.

Los objetivos específicos que abordó la auditoría coordinada fueron:

1) Identificar la situación actual de la matriz eléctrica en cada uno de los países miembros participantes de la OLACEFS;

2) Evaluar si existen políticas públicas establecidas para el alcance de los compromisos nacionales y/o internacionales asumidos para la expansión de las energías renovables en el sector eléctrico, en especial para el logro de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y del Acuerdo de París;

3) Analizar las inversiones en infraestructura para la generación de energía eléctrica sostenible (fuentes hídrica, eólica, solar, biomasa, marea, etc.) y eventuales barreras existentes para la  inserción/expansión de esta infraestructura, sobre todo con relación a los aspectos relacionados a los desafíos operacionales, cuestiones regulatorias, políticas de subsidio y de fomento, seguridad energética, precio de la energía, modulación de las tarifas, entre otros.